Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:08

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Jared Leto Accused of Sexual Misconduct by Multiple Women, Denies Allegations - People.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How is it safe to put tape on your mouth at night?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Diddy trial day 21 recap: 3rd victim takes the stand as judge threatens to boot Combs - ABC News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
MIT’s Chilling Experiment That Could Prove Gravity Is Quantum - SciTechDaily
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Simple blood test detects cancer up to 3 years before symptoms appear - Earth.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.